{"id":8647,"date":"2025-02-17T17:02:32","date_gmt":"2025-02-17T22:02:32","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/cento.centre.edu\/?p=8647"},"modified":"2025-02-17T17:02:32","modified_gmt":"2025-02-17T22:02:32","slug":"if-i-were-a-billionaire","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cento.centre.edu\/index.php\/2025\/02\/17\/if-i-were-a-billionaire\/","title":{"rendered":"If I Were A Billionaire&#8230;"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>by Hallie Gleeson<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Scan today\u2019s top headlines and you\u2019ll spot a half-dozen references to Zuckerburg, Musk, Bezos, and the like. Barely a day goes by where we <em>don\u2019t<\/em> hear about the goings-on of the 0.01%. We joke, we groan, and sometimes we even admire \u2014 after all, most of them are self-made, or have at least given themselves that title.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>There are 492 billionaires in the United States\u2026 but say there was just one more. If I were a billionaire, here\u2019s what I\u2019d do.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>How much better the world would be! I\u2019d scribble off a tweet or two about \u201cchanging the system\u201d and \u201cmaking a difference.\u201d What good is charity without publicity?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The thing about being a billionaire is that you get to see the world in a whole new way\u2014mainly because you no longer have to deal with it the way everyone else does. The true mark of success is not how much good you do, but how much you can get away with.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Don\u2019t even get me started on tax havens. Why contribute to the country that gave me my start when I can park my money in a jurisdiction that has no idea what a &#8220;middle class&#8221; is? After all, taxes are just the government\u2019s way of redistributing my hard-earned wealth to people who <em>didn&#8217;t<\/em> create the next big app, right? Think people who work minimum wage jobs, or even worse, teachers. They should be grateful for the scraps I throw their way, like a new community center or a school with a plaque bearing my name. I even donate to Congressmen! <em>You\u2019re welcome, America.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"500\" height=\"333\" src=\"https:\/\/cento.centre.edu\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/image-3.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-8648\" srcset=\"https:\/\/cento.centre.edu\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/image-3.png 500w, https:\/\/cento.centre.edu\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/image-3-300x200.png 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 500px) 100vw, 500px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>Ah, the billionaire class. Masters of innovation, purveyors of progress, and the unchallenged arbiters of culture, right? Well, not exactly. In fact, the latest follies of Elon Musk and Mark Zuckerberg prove that not even an infinite fortune can protect you from spectacular miscalculations. Recently, both of these tech moguls have offered a free masterclass in how to burn through vast sums of money and goodwill while somehow managing to outdo each other in the category of \u201cWhat Were They Thinking?\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Musk\u2019s approach to presidential politics highlights his deeper commitment to the idea that wealth is the only qualification needed for leadership, even when there&#8217;s no clear vision for the future\u2014or, you know, any actual political experience. When you\u2019re a billionaire like Musk or Zuckerberg, the assumption is that you have the resources, the vision, and the foresight to steer the ship. But more often than not, these tech moguls have shown that their wealth only compounds their vanity, leading to high-risk gambles with very little self-awareness. No amount of hubris can hide the fact that wealth doesn\u2019t equate to wisdom.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Mark Zuckerberg has been having what can only be described as an extended identity crisis in the tech world. First there was Threads, Meta\u2019s attempt to create a Twitter alternative. The rollout was supposed to be a game-changer\u2014a seamless transition for social media users who were frustrated with Twitter\u2019s erratic management under Musk.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Except Threads launched with a fanfare that fizzled out faster than the app&#8217;s user retention rate.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Despite a decent initial buzz, users quickly realized that, like many Meta products before it, <em>Threads<\/em> felt like a hastily thrown-together platform that lacked the magic of its predecessor. It was supposed to be a \u201cclean\u201d alternative, but in reality, it was riddled with bugs, poorly designed, and left users wondering, \u201cWhy would I use this when Twitter\u2014or even X, or whatever it\u2019s called now\u2014does the same thing?\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>But he kept going, leaning into sweeping changes to the platform, while competitor TikTok faced mounting threats of a ban in the U.S. over security concerns. Zuckerberg could have just kept his mouth shut and welcomed the digital refugees. Instead, he decided to act like a chef boasting about his new restaurant with decreased food safety regulations while the neighboring building&#8217;s foundation crumbles beneath them. Now everyone is ordering Chinese takeout.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In the end, the billionaire class doesn\u2019t just fail spectacularly\u2014they do so in ways that waste not just their money, but our time. And as they squabble over social media dominance and presidential power, the rest of us are left to wonder: are these really the people who should be in charge of our future?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>by Hallie Gleeson Scan today\u2019s top headlines and you\u2019ll spot a half-dozen references to Zuckerburg, Musk, Bezos, and the like. Barely a day goes by where we don\u2019t hear about the goings-on of the 0.01%. We joke, we groan, and sometimes we even admire \u2014 after all, most of them are self-made, or have at [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":8649,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[10],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-8647","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-opinions"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cento.centre.edu\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8647","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cento.centre.edu\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cento.centre.edu\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cento.centre.edu\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cento.centre.edu\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8647"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/cento.centre.edu\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8647\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8650,"href":"https:\/\/cento.centre.edu\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8647\/revisions\/8650"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cento.centre.edu\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/8649"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cento.centre.edu\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8647"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cento.centre.edu\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8647"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cento.centre.edu\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8647"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}